Question:
there is a player who had taken 10 wickets in one innings,before kumble.plz give me the details of that match?
chiru r
2006-08-07 01:56:41 UTC
i want the all details of that match including all the player names participated in that cricket match.
Fifteen answers:
Indian
2006-08-07 02:00:26 UTC
Jim Lacker of england and this is happened 50 years ago
chunnu
2006-08-07 11:01:13 UTC
Jim Laker. He will always be remembered for taking 19 wickets in a test.10/90 in first innings and 9/37 in second.



Here is some more information:

England 1st innings R M 4 6

PE Richardson c Maddocks b Benaud 104 222 11 0

MC Cowdrey c Maddocks b Lindwall 80 190 11 0

Rev.DS Sheppard b Archer 113 295 14 1

*PBH May c Archer b Benaud 43 111 6 0

TE Bailey b Johnson 20 43 2 0

C Washbrook lbw b Johnson 6 8 1 0

ASM Oakman c Archer b Johnson 10 11 1 0

+TG Evans st Maddocks b Johnson 47 29 5 2

JC Laker run out 3 10 0 0

GAR Lock not out 25 44 1 0

JB Statham c Maddocks b Lindwall 0 4 0 0

Extras (b 2, lb 5, w 1) 8

Total (all out, 158.3 overs) 459



FoW: 1-174 (Cowdrey), 2-195 (Richardson), 3-288 (May),

4-321 (Bailey), 5-327 (Washbrook), 6-339 (Oakman),

7-401 (Evans), 8-417 (Laker), 9-458 (Sheppard),

10-459 (Statham).



Bowling O M R W

Lindwall 21.3 6 63 2

Miller 21 6 41 0

Archer 22 6 73 1

Johnson 47 10 151 4

Benaud 47 17 123 2



Australia 1st innings R M 4 6

CC McDonald c Lock b Laker 32 80 5 0

JW Burke c Cowdrey b Lock 22 102 2 0

RN Harvey b Laker 0 2 0 0

ID Craig lbw b Laker 8 22 1 0

KR Miller c Oakman b Laker 6 15 0 1

KD Mackay c Oakman b Laker 0 2 0 0

RG Archer st Evans b Laker 6 12 1 0

R Benaud c Statham b Laker 0 2 0 0

RR Lindwall not out 6 14 1 0

+LV Maddocks b Laker 4 7 0 0

*IWG Johnson b Laker 0 2 0 0

Extras 0

Total (all out, 40.4 overs) 84



FoW: 1-48 (McDonald), 2-48 (Harvey), 3-62 (Burke), 4-62 (Craig),

5-62 (Mackay), 6-73 (Miller), 7-73 (Benaud), 8-78 (Archer),

9-84 (Maddocks), 10-84 (Johnson).



Bowling O M R W

Statham 6 3 6 0

Bailey 4 3 4 0

Laker 16.4 4 37 9

Lock 14 3 37 1



Australia 2nd innings (following on) R M 4 6

CC McDonald c Oakman b Laker 89 337 10 0

JW Burke c Lock b Laker 33 105 4 0

RN Harvey c Cowdrey b Laker 0 1 0 0

ID Craig lbw b Laker0 10 0 0

Craig lbw b Laker 38 259 5 0

KD Mackay c Oakman b Laker 0 6 0 0

KR Miller b Laker 0 15 0 0

RG Archer c Oakman b Laker 0 10 0 0

R Benaud b Laker 18 105 3 0

RR Lindwall c Lock b Laker 8 41 1 0

*IWG Johnson not out 1 25 0 0

+LV Maddocks lbw b Laker 2 6 0 0

Extras (b 12, lb 4) 16

Total (all out, 150.2 overs) 205



FoW: 1-28 (Harvey), 2-55 (Burke), 3-114 (Craig), 4-124 (Mackay),

5-130 (Miller), 6-130 (Archer), 7-181 (McDonald),

8-198 (Benaud), 9-203 (Lindwall), 10-205 (Maddocks).



Bowling O M R W

Statham 16 10 15 0

Bailey 20 8 31 0

Laker 51.2 23 53 10

Lock 55 30 69 0

Oakman 8 3 21 0
Zuhair-from-pakistan
2006-08-07 02:03:27 UTC
England 1st innings R M 4 6

PE Richardson c Maddocks b Benaud 104 222 11 0

MC Cowdrey c Maddocks b Lindwall 80 190 11 0

Rev.DS Sheppard b Archer 113 295 14 1

*PBH May c Archer b Benaud 43 111 6 0

TE Bailey b Johnson 20 43 2 0

C Washbrook lbw b Johnson 6 8 1 0

ASM Oakman c Archer b Johnson 10 11 1 0

+TG Evans st Maddocks b Johnson 47 29 5 2

JC Laker run out 3 10 0 0

GAR Lock not out 25 44 1 0

JB Statham c Maddocks b Lindwall 0 4 0 0

Extras (b 2, lb 5, w 1) 8

Total (all out, 158.3 overs) 459



FoW: 1-174 (Cowdrey), 2-195 (Richardson), 3-288 (May),

4-321 (Bailey), 5-327 (Washbrook), 6-339 (Oakman),

7-401 (Evans), 8-417 (Laker), 9-458 (Sheppard),

10-459 (Statham).



Bowling O M R W

Lindwall 21.3 6 63 2

Miller 21 6 41 0

Archer 22 6 73 1

Johnson 47 10 151 4

Benaud 47 17 123 2



Australia 1st innings R M 4 6

CC McDonald c Lock b Laker 32 80 5 0

JW Burke c Cowdrey b Lock 22 102 2 0

RN Harvey b Laker 0 2 0 0

ID Craig lbw b Laker 8 22 1 0

KR Miller c Oakman b Laker 6 15 0 1

KD Mackay c Oakman b Laker 0 2 0 0

RG Archer st Evans b Laker 6 12 1 0

R Benaud c Statham b Laker 0 2 0 0

RR Lindwall not out 6 14 1 0

+LV Maddocks b Laker 4 7 0 0

*IWG Johnson b Laker 0 2 0 0

Extras 0

Total (all out, 40.4 overs) 84



FoW: 1-48 (McDonald), 2-48 (Harvey), 3-62 (Burke), 4-62 (Craig),

5-62 (Mackay), 6-73 (Miller), 7-73 (Benaud), 8-78 (Archer),

9-84 (Maddocks), 10-84 (Johnson).



Bowling O M R W

Statham 6 3 6 0

Bailey 4 3 4 0

Laker 16.4 4 37 9

Lock 14 3 37 1



Australia 2nd innings (following on) R M 4 6

CC McDonald c Oakman b Laker 89 337 10 0

JW Burke c Lock b Laker 33 105 4 0

RN Harvey c Cowdrey b Laker 0 1 0 0

ID Craig lbw b Laker 38 259 5 0

KD Mackay c Oakman b Laker 0 6 0 0

KR Miller b Laker 0 15 0 0

RG Archer c Oakman b Laker 0 10 0 0

R Benaud b Laker 18 105 3 0

RR Lindwall c Lock b Laker 8 41 1 0

*IWG Johnson not out 1 25 0 0

+LV Maddocks lbw b Laker 2 6 0 0

Extras (b 12, lb 4) 16

Total (all out, 150.2 overs) 205



FoW: 1-28 (Harvey), 2-55 (Burke), 3-114 (Craig), 4-124 (Mackay),

5-130 (Miller), 6-130 (Archer), 7-181 (McDonald),

8-198 (Benaud), 9-203 (Lindwall), 10-205 (Maddocks).



Bowling O M R W

Statham 16 10 15 0

Bailey 20 8 31 0

Laker 51.2 23 53 10

Lock 55 30 69 0

Oakman 8 3 21 0
Ω Nookey™
2006-08-09 10:45:37 UTC
James Charles Laker (February 9, 1922 – April 23, 1986) was a cricketer who played for England in the 1950s, most famous for "Laker's match" in 1956 at Old Trafford, when he took nineteen wickets in England's victory against Australia.

It included a 10 wicket haul in an inning making him the first ever man to do so.



You can find more about him here :-

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jim_Laker
prince is raja
2006-08-07 02:01:38 UTC
Jim Laker



Jim Laker will always be remembered for his bowling in the Test match at Old Trafford in 1956, when he took 19 Australian wickets for 90, 9 for 37 in the first innings and 10 for 53 in the second.



The second link below has all the details you asked
Varun
2006-08-10 08:09:14 UTC
There is a player. It is Jim Laker. He took 19 wickets for 90 runs. I don't know the details of that match.
2006-08-10 06:33:49 UTC
Jim Laker he 19 wickets in that 10 in first innings and 9 in second again Australia in ashes.He was an off-spiner who bowls from around the wicket.
shobh323
2006-08-11 01:24:51 UTC
the match was between england and australia and jimlaker of england took all 10 australian wickets to fall in the first innings. he also took 9 in the second to produce the best match figures till date.
2006-08-10 06:24:43 UTC
the other spinner is the Jim Laker of england who had got all ten wickets in an innings. murali had taken 9 wickets twice but yet to get them all.
abdul
2006-08-07 06:26:24 UTC
Jim Lacker
Dharan N
2006-08-07 02:08:53 UTC
Jim laker
2006-08-07 02:08:00 UTC
its Jim laker of UK against the australians

venue :old trafford , england

he was awarded man of the match as u can guess
sendtokkk
2006-08-10 23:56:46 UTC
jim laker
freakjerk
2006-08-10 21:32:51 UTC
James Charles Laker (February 9, 1922 – April 23, 1986) was a cricketer who played for England in the 1950s, most famous for "Laker's match" in 1956 at Old Trafford, when he took nineteen wickets in England's victory against Australia.



Born in Frizinghall, near Bradford, Yorkshire, he was known as an elegant off-spin bowler. He consistently performed well against Australian cricket teams, and formed a successful partnership with Tony Lock, a left-arm orthodox spinner. He was also part of the Surrey side that dominated the county championship with seven consecutive titles from 1952 to 1958.



Laker was the first to take all 10 wickets in a Test match innings, ten for 53 in the fourth Test against Australia at Old Trafford in 1956 (the only other bowler to take all 10 wickets is Anil Kumble of India in 1999). Having also taken nine for 37 in the first innings, Laker's match bowling figures were 19-90: no other bowler has taken more than seventeen wickets in a first-class match.[1] Laker was married to an Austrian national who did not know much about cricket. On the day of his achievement when he arrived home, his wife asked him, "Jim, did you do something good today?" after she had taken hundreds of congratulatory telephone calls. Remarkably, Laker had also taken all ten wickets in an innings for Surrey against the same Australians earlier in the season.



He was a Wisden Cricketer of the Year in 1952. He played 46 Test matches, taking 193 wickets with a bowling average of 21.24; in first-class matches, he took 1,944 wickets at 18.41.



After his retirement from the Surrey team, he played occasionally for Auckland and Essex. In later years Laker was a commentator on BBC television's cricket coverage. He died in Putney, London.



Jim Laker

England (Eng)



Batting style Right-handed batsman (RHB)

Bowling type Right Arm Off Break (ROS)

Tests First-class

Matches 46 450

Runs scored 676 7304

Batting average 14.08 16.60

100s/50s 0/2 2/18

Top score 63 113

Balls bowled 12027 101974

Wickets 193 1944

Bowling average 21.24 18.41

5 wickets in innings 9 127

10 wickets in match 3 32

Best bowling 10-53 10-53

Catches/stumpings 12/0 270/0



Jim Laker will always be remembered for his bowling in the Test match at Old Trafford in 1956, when he took 19 Australian wickets for 90, 9 for 37 in the first innings and 10 for 53 in the second. No other bowler has taken more than seventeen wickets in a first-class match, let alone in a Test match. The feat is unique and, rash though it may seem to say, may well remain so. Ten wickets in an innings, more than any other achievement in cricket, must contain a large element of luck: however well a man bowls, the odds must always be that his partner will pick up a wicket. In this case these odds were heavier than usual because Lock at the other end was, on such a wicket, as great a spinner as Laker and bowled superbly. What turned the scale was that Laker was bowling off-breaks whereas Lock relied on the left-armer's natural leg-break, and the Australians at that period were wholly inexperienced in playing off-breaks, especially on a wicket which, heavily marled and almost devoid of grass, might have been designed for an off-spinner.



Since the days of Howell and Trumble at the turn of the century, Australian wickets had become so unresponsive to finger-spin that the off-break had virtually disappeared and sides relied on pace and wrist-spin - Gregory and McDonald, Lindwall, Miller and Johnston or again Hordern, Mailey, Grimmett and O'Reilly. Against these two types of bowler the essential is to get into line, so that the bat can swing straight down the path of the ball. But the batsman who follows this principle against vicious off-spin soon finds himself reduced to an ugly jab right across the line, and the result is always likely to be an lbw or a catch to one of the close-fielders. Moreover, so accurate was Laker that these fielders could stand very close indeed. In any case this was the weakest Australian batting side for more than 60 years, with the possible exception of 1912 when four of their essential batsmen refused to come. In particular, they lacked a great attacking genius like Trumper, MacArtney or Bradman who would refuse to be dictated to and who might have disrupted the entire plan. Indeed, the Australians had had a foretaste earlier in the season of what might happen when, for Surrey at The Oval, Laker had taken 10 for 88 in the first innings, the only instance of a bowler performing the feat twice in one season. Altogether that summer he played seven times against the Australians and took 63 wickets for 10 runs each.



Born at Frizinghall, near Bradford, Laker was brought up in Yorkshire and in his schooldays was a batsman and a fast bowler. It was B. B. Wilson who, in indoor nets early in the war, suggested that he should change to off-spin and, while serving in the Middle East and having the chance of playing Army cricket with a number of distinguished players, he turned the advice to good account. Before being demobilised he was billeted at Catford and joined the cricket club, whose president then was Andrew Kempton, who for years did so much for young Surrey cricketers. Kempton recommended him to The Oval and, after playing twice for Surrey in 1946 against the Combined Services, he was taken on the county staff, the Surrey authorities having first made sure that Yorkshire were not interested. He soon made his place secure in the Surrey side in 1947 and headed their bowling averages. At the end of the season he was picked for the largely experimental MCC side which Gubby Allen was taking to the West Indies and was one of the few successes among the untried players. In the first innings of the first Test he took 7 for 103 (six of them on the second morning for 25) and, though handicapped later by strained stomach muscles, he came out top of the averages.



However, in England in 1948 he suffered a severe setback. The Australian side that year was, at a modest computation, one of the strongest batting sides in the history of cricket, and nothing in Laker's limited experience had prepared him for such an ordeal. On his second appearance against them for MCC at Lord's, he was hit for nine 6s on the second morning. None the less he was chosen for the first Test and created a sensation by being easily the top scorer in the first innings with 63 made in 90 minutes: the total was 165 and he and Bedser added 89 for the ninth wicket. He also took three early wickets, Morris, Barnes and Miller, but after that he was ineffective, as he was too in the second Test. Dropped for the third Test, he was recalled for the fourth, in which Australia, set to get 404 in 344 minutes, got them within a quarter of an hour of time. The pitch was taking spin, the ball was lifting - a few years later, Laker would have been in his element. Unfortunately he failed to keep a length: moreover, although there was a spot just where a slow left-armer or leg-spinner could have used it, it was no help to him. Altogether that season his fourteen wickets against the Australians cost him 59.35 runs each, and it was probably this, and especially the treatment he received at Lord's, which led the selectors to feel that, however successful he might be in county cricket, he was not really a Test match bowler.



Yet in the coming years, in the immensely strong Surrey sides which won the Championship season after season, he and Lock proved themselves one of the greatest combinations on a turning wicket in cricket history, comparable with Peel and Briggs for England, Blythe and Woolley for Kent or Parker and Goddard for Gloucestershire. Laker may well have thought that, when he took eight for 2 for England against the Rest at Bradford in 1950, his place in the England side was secure, but in the next six years he was often left out in England and went on only one tour abroad, to the West Indies, where it has to be admitted that he was terribly expensive. However, he did have his successes in England. It was, for instance, undoubtedly he who won the final Test against South Africa in 1951 with 4 for 64 and 6 for 55, and after taking more than 100 wickets for Surrey alone that season he was included among the Five Cricketers of the Year in the 1952Wisden.



After 1956 the attitude of the selectors naturally changed. In 1957 Laker played in four Tests against West Indies, missing one through illness, and again in 1958 in four of the five against New Zealand. In 1956-57 he was one of the MCC side in South Africa, where he met with fair success, and at last in 1958-59 was picked for a tour of Australia, where he topped the bowling averages both in the Tests and in all first-class matches. But he was by now feeling the strain and opted out of the New Zealand part of the tour which followed. In England in 1959 he was not the bowler he had been: his 78 wickets cost 24.61 runs each and he was much handicapped by an arthritic finger. At the end of the season he retired from the Surrey side, having taken for them, over thirteen years, 1,395 wickets at 17.37 in 309 matches: eleven times he had more than 100 wickets in a season. However, in 1962 he was persuaded by his friend, Trevor Bailey, to turn out for Essex, and for three years he appeared for them in 30 matches as an amateur. He was still capable of discomfiting the best players.



In 1960 he had published a book, Over to Me, which gave so much offence to the authorities at Lord's and The Oval that they withdrew his honorary membership of MCC and Surrey, although these were restored some years later, and at the time of his death he was Chairman of Surrey's cricket committee. Meanwhile he had found himself a new career as a television cricket commentator: he had, of course, a deep knowledge of his subject, he was admirably clear and, though outspoken, never unfair.



In all first-class matches he took 1,944 wickets at 18.41 and scored 7,304 runs with an average of 16.60, including two centuries, both for Surrey. In 46 Test matches, he took 193 wickets at 21.24. He was also a good close-fielder. Wisden Almanack 1987
cutepraveen4u
2006-08-10 05:47:32 UTC
In around 1700 test cricket matches played in over 100 years of the sport, only twice have all ten wickets been taken in a single innings by a single bowler. It is truly a Great Sporting Achievement to do so.



Jim Laker, 1956



Ashes to ashes, dust to dust.

If Laker don't get you, Locky must.

Yorkshireman Jim Laker (1922 - 1986) did it first in July 1956, somewhat satisfyingly for followers of English cricket, against the Australians in an Ashes series. Laker had previously in the same year shown the touring Australians what he could do, while playing for Surrey at the Oval, taking all ten wickets during a warm-up match to the Ashes series. Here was his chance to do it again in the Test arena.



After a win apiece and a draw in the opening three matches, the fourth test opened at Old Trafford on 26 July, 1956, with both sides eager for a win to take an unassailable lead in the five-match series. England captain Peter May won the toss and elected to bat first. It was a good decision. At the end of the first day, England had posted 307 runs on the board for the loss of only three wickets. Shortly after lunch on the second day, England were all out for 459 with both Peter Richardson and David Sheppard having scored centuries.



Australia's first innings reply was short-lived. They soon lost both openers, Colin McDonald to Laker and Jim Burke having been caught out by Colin Cowdrey off the bowling of Tony Lock. Between them, they'd scored 54 runs; the rest of the Australian team would only manage another 30 runs. Half an hour after tea they were all out for only 84. Laker himself had figures of 9 for 37, the best bowling figures in Test cricket for 60 years.



Forced then to follow on, the second day closed with Australia at 53 for 1, still trailing by 322 runs, left-hander Neil Harvey, the man out registering a pair1. Being Manchester in July, rain almost inevitably intervened and during the third and fourth playing days (either side of the rest day2) less than two hours play were possible. It was nevertheless sufficient for Jim Laker to add the wicket of Jim Burke to his tally, who was caught out by Tony Lock for 33 during the third day, having added nothing to his overnight score. At the end of day four, Australia had moved on to 84 for 2, still 291 behind.



Thus, on 31 July 1956, the fifth and final day commenced with Australia needing to bat through to secure a draw, a win now out of the question. It was a big ask, as they say in Australia. The pitch, which had shown signs of breaking-up after only the first day (leading some to level accusations that the pitch had been doctored for spin, all denied, of course, by the Lancashire authorities) was again drying out after the three wet days. The stiff gale that was blowing would only dry it out quicker, although it made conditions generally difficult for both batsmen and bowlers. Bowling prodigiously accurate and intelligent off-spin from the Stretford End, Laker slowly but surely whittled away the Australian order, his partner Tony Lock consistently beating the bat, but crucially not taking a wicket from the other end. Resistance came only from square-set Charlie MacDonald who managed a stubborn 89 before being caught by Alan Oakman... Australia 181 for 7. And when Lindwall went, Laker for the second time in the game had a nine wicket haul, but this time there was still one more wicket to fall with barely half an hour left to play before the close. Fortunately for Jim Laker, and for the history-writers, the Australian keeper Maddocks could only add two to the score before being trapped leg before, Australia all out for 205. Not only had England won the match by an innings and 170 runs, retaining the Ashes in the process, but for the first time in test cricket one bowler had taken all ten wickets in an innings. Australia had been well and truly 'Lakered'.



Laker's return of 10 for 53 in the second innings at Old Trafford remains the best test bowling analysis of all time. In total Laker had taken 19 wickets in the test, his opportunity for a complete clean sweep of the Aussies having been scuppered early in the first innings by his Surrey-based spin-twin Tony Lock. His match figures of 19 for 90 remain the record for any first class match, let alone a test match.



Anil Kumble, 1999



Laker's effort was matched at Delhi's Ferozeshah Kotla Stadium on 7 February, 1999, by Indian Anil Kumble, against old enemy Pakistan. Indeed, Kumble's analysis of 10 for 74 masks the fact that he took all ten Pakistani wickets in one 21.3 over spell, conceding only 49 runs in the process.



India went into this match already 1-0 down in the two match series, desperate to avenge the narrow 12-run defeat by Pakistan in Chennai a week previously. Tensions in the 25,000 capacity ground were characteristically high, bordering on bedlam, Pakistan being jeered by a feverishly partisan Indian crowd, with the rotund Inzamam-ul-Haq being singled-out for particular abuse, labelled an 'aloo' - a potato. Meanwhile, the pitch itself already had its doubters, having been laid hurriedly after having been dug up by extremists opposed to any friendly relations between the two neighbouring nations.



So it was no surprise that when the match got underway, after India had won the toss and elected to bat, Pakistani spin-wizard Saqlain Mushtaq managed to capitalise on the conditions. The batting team closed at stumps on 247 for 8 with Saqlain having taken 5 for 94 off a mammoth 34.5 overs, including Tendulkar, cheaply. As if demonstrating the ground's propensity to take spin, wrist-spinner Mushtaq Ahmed also picked up two wickets on the day and it could have been more for the two spinners if the Pakistani fielders hadn't put ball to ground on several occasions.



India managed to add only five runs to the total before being all out early in day two, but Indian spinners Anil Kumble and 19-year old Harbajan Singh immediately followed Saqlain's suit by taking seven of the ten wickets during the Pakistani innings. Pakistan were bowled out in only four-and-a-half hours for 172. At stumps, India had scored 46 for 1 in their second innings, extending the lead to 126. Day three saw more of the same, India losing seven more wickets, but posting a decent score in return, Sadagoppan Ramesh's top-scoring with 96. At stumps then, India were 324 for seven, boasting a lead of 404, although it could have been considerably less, but for some favourable umpiring from home-grown umpire Jayaprakash.



Early into day four, India were all out for 339, having added only 15 to their overnight total for the loss of the last three wickets. Pakistan now had two days either to bat through for a draw or to post a world record fourth innings total of 420 runs to win the match. Indian captain Mohammed Azharuddin set out to contain the Pakistanis rather than to attack them, in doing so attracting criticism of his tactics. At lunch Pakistan were 101 for no loss off just 15 overs and looked set for the target of 420 runs, with Kumble having gone for 25 off his first five overs.



But then things changed and an important piece of cricketing history was made. Shortly after lunch, Kumble bowled the second ball of his ninth over, now from the Pavillion end. A swish of willow through air later and Pakistani opener Shahid Afridi was perhaps controversially given out by umpire Jayaprakash whose impartiality had already raised a few eyebrows, caught behind by Nayan Mongia. The very next ball, Ijaz Ahmed was trapped LBW and again the finger went up. Kumble was on a hat-trick. He didn't get it, but 15 minutes later, Kumble had taken two more wickets in three balls. First down was the potato, Inzamam-ul-Haq, bowled, dragging the ball onto his own stumps and then Yousuf Youhanna plumb LBW. Moin Khan, caught by Sourav Ganguly at slip, was the next to go, followed by opener Saeed Anwar caught at short-leg. Kumble's post-lunch spell of 16 overs had yielded six wickets for 43 runs and, with Anwar gone, any hopes Pakistan had of saving the match were all but dashed.



Salim Malik was then clean bowled, indisputably Kumble's seventh victim after whom Mushtaq Ahmed was caught by Rahul Dravid to become the eighth. Pakistan's tail was exposed and it didn't take Anil Kumble long to stop it wagging. Saqlain Mushtaq was trapped LBW off the first ball of Kumble's next over. Goodwill from the captain assisted Kumble's cause, Azharuddin instructing Javagal Srinath to bowl wide so as not to take the tenth wicket. Inevitably it seems, Wasim Akram was then caught off the bowling of Anil Kumble and Kumble's name was entered alongside Laker's in the record books.



While supporters of Pakistan may denounce man-of-the-match Anil Kumble's effort as having been umpire-assisted, the fact remains that his figures of 10 for 74 are the all-time second best after Jim Laker's. Moreover, the victory ended India's 19-year and 16-match win drought against Pakistan, which had endured since 1979 when they had won a six-Test series 2-0.



Postscript - Richard Stokes, 1956 and 1999



In 1956, 10-year-old Richard Stokes, son of a B-Division Surrey cricketer was taken to Old Trafford by his father to see England play Australia in the fourth Ashes Test, specifically to watch the Surrey spin-paring of Laker and Lock. It was a dream come true for the boy as he was able to witness first-hand Jim Laker's phenomenal and, at the time, unique achievement.



Some 33 years later, Stokes, now a trainer for KPMG Finance in Germany, was on a business trip to New Delhi, India. It was his birthday, and he thought he'd take in a bit of cricket; he went to see India play Pakistan at Ferozeshah Kotla ...



I made it to the ground after lunch and Pakistan were very comfortable. Immediately, Kumble got two in an over and I told a friend of mine that I have brought luck to Kumble and India. When he had taken six wickets, I told him about my having watched Laker's feat, and he just said that history was about to be repeated. I merely laughed.

- Richard Stokes, Cricket Fan


This content was originally posted on Y! Answers, a Q&A website that shut down in 2021.
Loading...